Wednesday, March 23, 2011

P'raya Sarawak: Undi 16 April, penamaan 6 April

Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR) menetapkan hari penamaan calon untuk pilihan raya negeri Sarawak pada 6 April manakala hari pengundiannya pula jatuh pada 16 April.

Ini bermakna tempoh berkempen selama 11 hari. Pengumuman itu sebentar tadi dibuat pengerusi SPR Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof di Kuching.

DUN Sarawak dibubarkan kelmarin yang mana secara perlembagaan, pilihan raya hendaklah diadakan sebelum Julai tahun ini.

BN Sarawak yang lama dipimpin Ketua Menteri Tan Sri Abdul Taib Mahmud menguasai 63 daripada 71 kerusi dalam dewan manakala pembangkang pula dengan tujuh kerusi, termasuk satu masing-masing milik bebas dan Parti Cinta Malaysia.

Pilihan raya sebelum ini diadakan pada 20 Mei 2006.

malaysiakini.com

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Analisis PRU Sarawak 2006



 SPR Challenge for 2011 Sarawak Election is how to increase the voters to cast their vote. As we know if Election is on May, the percentage will be not so much different from 2006 because by June is Gawai festival and many of voters outside Sarawak will not coming home.

PKR candidate’s line up in Dayaks majority areas and assessment/rating by SB (Special Branch) as at 15/3/2011

malilebu on March 15th, 2011 4:25 pm

                                                        (PKR)                     VS               (SNAP)
• N1 OPAR                                    John Tenewi Nuek                            Stephen Sigar
• N2 TASIK BIRU                         Maxillian                                            Frankie Jurem Nyumboi
• N16 BENGOH                            Willie Gomin                                      Richard Peter Munai
• N17 TARAT                                Peter Ato
• N18 TEBEDU                              Dr. Christoper Kiyu
• N25 BALAI RINGIN                  Ibi Uding                                             Dan Giang
• N26 BUKIT BEGUNAN             Jimmy Donald
• N29 BATANG AIR                     Nicholas Bawin                    
• N31 LAYAR                                Stanny Embat                                    Joe Unggang
• N34 KRIAN                                Ali Biju                                              Anthony Liman Sujang
• N42 MELUAN                            Dr John Brian              
• N43 NGEMAH                           Warren Aris
• N44 MACHAN                           Rimong                                             Augustine Liom
• N52 TAMIN                               Mengga Mikui
• N53 KAKUS                              Joshua Jabeng
• N54 PELAGUS                          Edward Sumbang
• N55 KATIBAS                           Ambrose Abadi
• N56 BALEH                               Frankie Bedindang                            George Lagong
• N57 BELAGA                            Ali Basah                                          John Bampa
• N60 KEMENA                           Bernard Bayang
• N61 BEKENU                            Zulraidah Suboh
• N62 LAMBIR                             Jemat                                                 Johari Bujang
• N69 BATU DANAU                   Dr. Lai
• N70 BA’KELALAN                   Baru Bian

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

PKR candidate’s line up in Dayaks majority areas and assessment/rating by SB (Special Branch) as at 9/3/2011

• N1 OPAR (Cikgu Vincent) 26%
• N2 TASIK BIRU (Maxillian) 30%
• N16 BENGOH (Willie Gomin) 34%
• N17 TARAT (Peter Ato) 31%
• N18 TEBEDU (Dr. Christoper Kiyu) 33%
• N25 BALAI RINGIN (Ibi Uding) 29%
• N26 BUKIT BEGUNAN (Jimmy Donald) 28%
• N29 BATANG AIR (Nicholas Bawin) 38%
• N31 LAYAR (Stanny Embat) 23%
• N34 KRIAN (Ali Biju) 36%
• N42 MELUAN (DJB) 21%
• N43 NGEMAH (Warren Aris) 20%
• N44 MACHAN ( Rimong) 20%
• N52 TAMIN (Mengga Mikui) 39%
• N53 KAKUS (Joshua Jabeng) 23%
• N54 PELAGUS (Edward Sumbang) 28%
• N55 KATIBAS (Ambrose Abadi) 31%
• N56 BALEH (Frankie Bedindang) 25%
• N57 BELAGA (Ali Basah) 29%
• N60 KEMENA (Bernard Bayang) 27%
• N61 BEKENU (Zulraidah Suboh) 24%
• N62 LAMBIR (Jemat) 26%
• N69 BATU DANAU (Dr. Lai)) 38%
• N70 BA’KELALAN (Baru Bian) 46%

NOTE: SB rating taking into accounts the possible clashes with SNAP candidates, PCM and independent in some areas.
DayakBaru.com

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Saman ekor: Ketahui hak anda

Zulhazmi Shariff   
Ramai yang masih kabur dan tidak faham hak mereka sebagai rakyat Malaysia. Perlembagaan Persekutuan adalah undang-undang tertinggi Negara. Perlembagaan Persekutuan menjamin hak setiap rakyat Malaysia tanpa mengira agam, kaum, bangsa dan juga fahaman politik. Semua warganegara dijamin hak yang sama.
Salah satu hak yang dijamin oleh Perlembagaan Persekutuan ialah hak rakyat terhadap harta. Ini disebut dalam Perkara 13 Perlembagaan Persekutuan.

Perkara 13 Perlembagaan Persekutuan
Hak terhadap harta.
(a) Tiada seseorang pun boleh dilucutkan hartanya kecuali mengikut undang-undang.
(b) Tiada sesuatu undang-undang pun boleh membuat peruntukan bagi mengambil atau menggunakan harta-harta dengan paksa dengan tiada pampasan yang mencukupi.

Selalunya Perkara 13 ini digunakan di dalam kes pengambilan tanah melalui Akta Pengambilan Tanah 1960. Sebenarnya Perkara 13 ini bukan sahaja melibatkan harta tak alih seperti tanah, tetapi meliputi harta alih seperti kenderaan. Justeru penafian hak memperbaharui cukai jalan dan lesen memandu oleh Jabatan Pengangkutan Jalan (JPJ) juga sebenarnya termasuk di dalam penafian hak rakyat terhadap harta. Alasannya jika seseorang rakyat itu dihalang dari memperbaharui cukai jalan kenderaan mereka yang menyebabkan kenderaan itu tidak boleh digunakan maka rakyat itu telah dinafikan haknya terhadap harta.

Jika seseorang rakyat telah dinafikan hak mereka menggunakan harta (kenderaan) mereka tanpa alasan yang berlandaskan peraturan dan undang-undang maka Perkara 13 (b) menyatakan bahawa pampasan hendaklah diberikan. Ini bermaksud jika JPJ menghalang seseorang memperbaharui cukai jalan yang menyebabkan kenderaan tidak boleh digunakan, maka JPJ hendaklah membayar pampasan kepada pemilik kenderaan tersebut.

Hujah ini adalah bersandarkan keputusan kes Leonard Lim Yaw Chiang lwn Director of Jabatan Pengangkutan Jalan Negeri Sarawak yang telah diputuskan pada tahun 2009. Di dalam kes ini, seorang rakyat bernama Leonard Lim Yaw Chiang telah disenarai hitam dan dihalang oleh JPJ Sarawak dari memperbaharui cukai jalan kereta beliau. Beliau telah memohon kepada Mahkamah Tinggi Kuching untuk memutuskan bahawa tindakan JPJ menyenarai hitam dan menghalang beliau memperbaharui cukai jalan adalah salah. Beliau juga memohon gantirugi daripada JPJ di atas kehilangan penggunaan kereta beliau selama kereta tersebut tidak boleh digunakan kerana tiada cukai jalan.

Mahkamah telah memutuskan bahawa JPJ tidak boleh menyenarai hitam kenderaan di atas suatu kesalahan yang belum dibuktikan di Mahkamah. Tindakan JPJ menyenarai hitam diputuskan telah bertentangan dengan Perkara 13 Perlembagaan. JPJ juga telah diarahkan membayar gantirugi kepada pemohon dalam kes itu kerana kesusahan beliau tidak dapat menggunakan kenderaan sehingga terpaksa menyewa kenderaan lain.

Justeru di sini ingin dimaklumkan kepada pemandu-pemandu dan pemilik-pemilik kenderaan yang dinafikan hak mereka memperbaharui cukai jalan dan lesen memandu, bahawa hak anda dilindungi oleh Perlembagaan. Pihak berkuasa tidak boleh sewenang-wenang menafikan hak anda.

Berbalik kepada tawaran Kerajaan memberikan diskaun pembayaran saman sehingga hari ini 28/2/2011.

Ingin dimaklumkan bahawa tindakan ini tetap salah. Isu utamanya ialah bukan jumlah bayaran kompaun atau denda itu RM300 atau RM150 atau pun RM50. Isu utamanya adalah, ADAKAH SESEORANG ITU BENAR-BENAR MELAKUKAN KESALAHAN YANG DIDAKWA SEHINGGA MEREKA WAJIB MEMBAYAR DENDA?

Perlu diambil perhatian bahawa untuk menguatkuasakan sesuatu peraturan dan undang-undang, sesebuah pihak berkuasa hendaklah juga mengikut peraturan dan undang-undang. Saman tidak boleh tertunggak. Jika ada yang tertunggak maka ianya bukan saman. Saman hendaklah dikemukakan di Mahkamah. Orang yang disaman (OKS) hendaklah diserahkan saman dan diperintahkan hadir ke Mahkamah untuk menjawap saman itu. Jika OKS mengaku salah maka mahkamah akan memerintahkan OKS itu membayar denda. Jika denda dibayar maka saman itu selesai dan tidak akan tertunggak. Jika saman diserahkan kepada OKS tetapi OKS tidak hadir ke Mahkamah, maka mahkamah akan keluarkan waran tangkap suapaya OKS hadir mahkamah. Maka proses yang sama akan berlaku iaitu OKS akan ditanya mangakui kesalahan atau meminta bicara. Jika mengaku maka akan diarahkan supaya bayar denda bagi saman itu. Maka selesailah saman itu. Tidak tertunggak. Jika tidak mengaku maka akan dibicarakan. Bergantung kepada keputusan mahkamah, jika didapati salah selepas bicara, maka akan diperintahkan untuk bayar denda. Selesai lah saman itu. Jika tidak bersalah maka luput juga samann itu. Tidak tertunggak.

Soalannya kenapa ada saman tertunggak? Jawapannya pertama kerana saman-saman itu tidak pernah dibawa ke Mahkamah. Kedua kerana yang dikatakan saman itu sebenarnya bukan saman tetapi notis sahaja.

Saman Ekor yang dikatakan saman ini sebenarnya bukan saman tetapi sekadar notis kepada pemilik kenderaan meminta maklumat pemandu yang dikatakan memandu melebihi hadlaju. Notis ini juga disertakan tawaran kompaun jika pemilik kenderaan mengaku melakukan kesalahan. Ia dikeluarkan di bawah Seksyen 115 Akta Pengangkutan Jalan 1987 atau dikenalai dengan Notis Pol 170A. Jika pemilik tidak mengaku kesalahan maka kompaun tidak perlu dibayar kerana kompaun itu hanyalah tawaran. Jika pemilik tidak membayar kompaun sepatutnya pemilik disaman supaya hadir ke Mahkamah bagi menjawap tuduhan memandu melebihi hadlaju. Kemudian proses mahkamah yang dijelaskan sebelum ini akan berlaku. Maka saman itu akan selesai dan tidak tertunggak. Masalah timbul apabila pihak berkuasa terus menghukum pemilik supaya membayar kompaun sedangkan kesalahan tidak dibuktikan. Kompaun bukan denda tetapi tawaran. Dendan hanya boleh dikeluarkan dan diarahkan oleh Mahkamah. Bukan Polis dan bukan JPJ.

Inilah penyalahgunaan kuasa dan peraturan oleh pihak berkuasa. Mereka bertindak melebihi kuasa yang diberikan. Mereka bertindak sebagai penghukum sedangkan tugas itu hanya ada pada Mahkamah.
Justeru kepada semua rakyat Malaysia, ketahui hak anda, jangan mudah terpedaya dengan tawaran dan penindasan.
Gunakan hak anda... TIADA SIAPA BOLEH MEMAKSA ANDA MEMBAYAR SESUATU YANG ANDA TIDAK LAKUKAN. Anda Mampu Mengubahnya.

Bagaimana JPJ boleh menhalang pembaharuan cukai jalan?

1) Seksyen 17(1)(d) Akta Pengangkutan Jalan 1987 (Pindaan) 2010
JPJ berkuasa menghalang seseorang melakukan apa-apa transaksi termasuk perbaharui cukai jalan tetapi setelah JPJ BERPUASHATI bahawa seseorang ada perkara yang belum selesai dengan JPJ dan Polis.
Bagaimana JPJ hendak BERPUASHATI?

2) Seksyen 17(2) Akta Pengangkutan Jalan 1987 (Pindaan) 2010
JPJ hendaklah memberikan peluang kepada seseorang membuat representasi. Ini bermaksud JPJ hendaklah menjalankan siasatan adakah seseorang itu ada perkara yang belum selesai. Maka semua pihak perlu hadir iaitu pemilik kenderaan, JPJ dan Polis yang mengeluarkan saman. Perlu disiasat adakah saman yang dikatakan ada kepada seseorang itu betul atau tidak. Sudah dibuktikan di mahakamh atau tidak. Jika tidak maka JPJ tidak boleh menyenarai hitam. Inilah maksud BERPUASHATI

3) Seksyen 17(5) Akta Pengangkutan Jalan 1987 (Pindaan) 2010
Jika dihalang daripada perbaharui cukai jalan maka Pengarah JPJ hendaklah maklumkan kepada Ketua Pengarah pengangkutan, di mana Ketua Pengarah hendaklah maklumkan secara bertulis dalam tempoh 14 hari kepada pemilik kenderaan tentang alasan halangan dibuat ke atas pemilik. Adakah notis ini pernah dikeluarkan kepada pemilik?

Jika anda dihalang daripada perbaharui cukai jalan tanpa alasan yang sah anda boleh:
a) Minta alasan bertulis daripada JPJ kenapa anda dihalang.
b) Minta JPJ perbaharui cukai jalan dengan segera jika alasan bertulis itu tidak munasabah dan tidak betul.
c) Jika JPJ enggan mematuhi permintaan anda, anda boleh menyaman/menuntut di Mahkamah untuk gantirugi kehilangan penggunaan kenderaan anda dan kesusahan anda kerana tidak boleh menggunakan kenderaan.

Zulhazmi Shariff ialah Penasihat Undang-Undang Kempen Anti Saman Ekor (KASE)

HarakahDaily.net

Thursday, March 3, 2011

Scorned ex-wives could ruin ‘Randy’ Rayong’s political career

Joseph Tawie | January 24, 2011 
 
Sarawakian politicians converting to Islam in a bid to stay in the game may see their plans backfire in the coming polls. 

KUCHING: Are conversions and polygamy the new political ball game in Sarawak? It appears that a rising number of political aspirants and have-beens are rumoured to be converting from Christianity to Islam to better their chances of currying favours with Chief Minister Taib Mahmud, who allegedly discriminates against non-Muslims.

Whether this new gameplan will work for them in the coming state polls is left to be seen. But political observers are betting that a number of Barisan Nasional candidates “will fall” in the polls for these very reasons.

Meanwhile, the “hottest” gossip to hit Kuching streets is Engkilili state assemblyman Johnical Rayong’s recent conversion. Most of his constituents were in shocked disbelief at his conversion, that is until his angry first wife, Patricia Dexter Sudok, a Christian staff nurse in Kuching, spewed her angst.

She reportedly learnt of her husband’s infidelity, marriage and conversion from an SMS message he sent her.
According to the reports, Rayong was caught for “khalwat” and was forced to marry one Kamasiah Abdul Jalil, a divorcee in her 30s with two children, who works in the chief minister’s office.

Rayong had apparently converted on Jan 29, 2010. (Was it coincidence then that partyless Rayong who had waited four long years outside Taib’s door was suddenly accepted into the fold in 2010, courtesy of Sarawak United People’s Party whose decision to take him in has cost them dearly?)

Deceiving the Dayaks
The story gets better. Patricia also said that Rayong had been harassing her to return and campaign alongside him as a “Christian couple” in order to mislead his Dayak voters.

Rayong and apparently quite a few other shy “new converts” such as Mambong MP James Dawos Mamit and Marudi assemblyman Sylvester Enterie are seeking to conceal their new status from their Dayak constituents.

Dawos, incidentally, is Deputy Tourism Minister and Enterie is an Assistant Minister in the Sarawak Cabinet.
All this is more fodder for the opposition, it appears. In the case of Rayong, who seems to have a cupboard-full of “skeletons”, he may have lost it all even before the race. According to a SUPP leader, the party is uncomfortable with Rayong’s “history” and is re-assessing his candidacy.

“The voters in Engkilili are not against him converting to Islam. Far from it. In fact, Christians and Muslims in Engkilili sit side by side in coffeeshops or restaurants. They also visit each other during Hari Raya and Christmas celebrations. They always live in harmony.

“But they do not like him because he failed to inform them (of his new status) as well as his failure to look after his two Iban wives,” said the leader who refused to be named.

Rayong, he claimed, has neglected his two families. His two wives were said to have complained to Deputy Chief Minister Alfred Jabu Numpang. They alleged Rayong had failed to come “home” for the past three months or so. His first wife, Patricia, is related to Jabu.

So angry and disappointed are his wives that they are prepared to campaign against Rayong if he does defend his Engkilili seat.

Less on integrity
Besides his scorned wives, Rayong will also have to contend with issues over the authencity of his degree “as a medical doctor” and his political track record.

His opponents have claimed that Rayong is only a doctor of homeopathy, but had presented himself as a medical doctor and opened up a clinic where he dispensed medicines and treated patients.

They alleged that when the authorities demanded for his certificates, Rayong closed shop. It has also raised questions about his integrity.

In the 2006 state election, Rayong won the Engkilili seat on a Sarawak National Party (SNAP) ticket. During his campaign, he attacked BN coalition partner SUPP and its candidate Johnathan Krai Pilo.

But less than a month after his win, Rayong declared that he was independent and a BN-friendly representative. His angry supporters called him a “political frog” who is only interested in his own personal affairs.

He subsequently applied to join an off-shoot of SNAP, Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party (SPDP) led by William Mawan Ikom. His application was initially accepted in 2007, but faced with strong opposition from SUPP and Taib’s Parti Pesaka Bumiputra Bersatu (PBB), he was forced to resign.

There was also a time when he wanted to join Parti Rakyat Sarawak (PRS) if the Engkilili seat was to be given to PRS under a swapping arrangement with SUPP. But that arrangement failed to materialise and as a result, he lost interest in PRS.

SUPP reassessing Rayong
In the meantime, Rayong had applied to become a SUPP member and for two years he was left waiting. Then suddenly in September 2010, SUPP approved his application, much against the wishes of majority of its members.

The SUPP’s decision resulted in the resignation of the Engkilili branch chairman and the former five-term elected representative, Toh Heng San, from the party.

But by joining SUPP, Rayong has left behind at least 60% of his supporters who were either members of SNAP or the defunct Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak (PBDS) and supporters of the stillborn Malaysian Dayak Congress (MDC) of which he was the protem deputy president.

In fact, his supporters are still angry with him for switching parties as they had voted him in on a SNAP ticket. Many SUPP members in Engkilili, too, may not vote for him as they consider him a “frog” that has upset their branch leaders including Toh and Krai.

After more than 20 years as an elected representative, Toh has a strong following not only among the Chinese but also among the Ibans in Engkilili. Toh and Krai’s supporters will certainly not vote for Rayong for his criticisms against SUPP and for neglecting the welfare and interest of the Dayak community during the last election.

Today, Rayong joins the party that he had severely condemned. In September, when accepting Rayong into SUPP fold, party president Dr George Chan described him as the most “suitable” candidate to represent the party as he was not only close to the people, but also popular with the rakyat.

Now, in the wake of Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak’s brazen command to give him “only winnable candidates”, Chan is being forced to acknowledge Rayong’s weaknesses and eat his own words on the latter’s “suitability” as Engkilili’s 2011 candidate.

FreeMalaysianToday.

Gangsters hired by BLD brought along machetes and explosives to threaten longhouse folks

 Our own Ibans Gangsters reported being paid for merely RM100 as “Security Personnel ?

 He thought that he can mess arround with the Ibans of Ulu Niah?

 The Gangsters were on Camping trip at the Oil Palm Estate?

 Scurity Personnel?

 For Self Defence?

Used explosives

 Explosives?


 
Gang Leader being arrested by what about the others?
 
NOTES:
1. MANDATORY DEATH PENALTY: FIREARMS, AMMUNITION AND EXPLOSIVES
Section 57 of the ISA prescribes a mandatory death penalty for certain offences to be tried in court,
(1) Any person who without lawful excuse, the onus of proving which shall be on that person, in any security area carries or has in his possession or under his control -
a) any firearm without lawful authority therefor: or
b) any ammunition or explosive without lawful authority therefor,
shall be guilty of an offence and shall, on conviction, be punished with death.

2. CORROSIVE AND EXPLOSIVE SUBSTANCES AND OFFENSIVE WEAPONS ACT 1958
Offenses relating to scheduled weapons

7. (1) Any person who, otherwise than for a lawful purpose—
(a) carries or has in his possession or under his control;
(b) manufactures, sells or hires or offers or exposes for sale or hire; or
(c) lends or gives to any other person,
any scheduled weapon shall be guilty of an offence and shall on conviction be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or to a fine not exceeding two thousand ringgit or both, and in the case of a second or subsequent offence to imprisonment for a term of not less than one year and not more than three years.
(2) In any prosecution for an offence under subsection (1) the onus of proving the existence of a lawful purpose shall be upon the accused.
(3) An offence under subsection (1) shall be deemed to be a seizable and non-bailable offence.
Consorting with persons carrying offensive weapons in public places

8. (1) Any person who consorts with, or is found in the company of, another person who is carrying or has in his possession or under his control any offensive weapon in contravention of section 6, in circumstances which raise a reasonable presumption that he knew that such other person was carrying or had in his possession or under his control any such weapon shall, unless he shall prove that he had reasonable grounds for believing that such other person was carrying or had in his possession or under his control any such weapon for a lawful purpose, be guilty of an offence and shall be liable to the like punishment as that other person with whom he was consorting or in whose company he was found.

(2) An offence against this section shall be deemed to be a seizable and non-bailable offence.
 
dayakbaru.com

Google Search Engine

Custom Search